mirror of
https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.general.git
synced 2024-09-14 20:13:21 +02:00
Add developer docs for the OpenStack modules
This commit is contained in:
parent
b154ad4cbb
commit
574bcac277
1 changed files with 49 additions and 0 deletions
49
lib/ansible/modules/cloud/openstack/README.md
Normal file
49
lib/ansible/modules/cloud/openstack/README.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
|
||||||
|
OpenStack Ansible Modules
|
||||||
|
=========================
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
These are a set of modules for interacting with OpenStack as either an admin
|
||||||
|
or an end user. If the module does not begin with os_, it's either deprecated
|
||||||
|
or soon to be. This document serves as developer coding guidelines for
|
||||||
|
modules intended to be here.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Naming
|
||||||
|
------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* All modules should start with os_
|
||||||
|
* If the module is one that a cloud consumer would expect to use, it should be
|
||||||
|
named after the logical resource it manages. Thus, os\_server not os\_nova.
|
||||||
|
The reasoning for this is that there are more than one resource that are
|
||||||
|
managed by more than one service and which one manages it is a deployment
|
||||||
|
detail. A good example of this are floating IPs, which can come from either
|
||||||
|
Nova or Neutron, but which one they come from is immaterial to an end user.
|
||||||
|
* If the module is one that a cloud admin would expect to use, it should be
|
||||||
|
be named with the service and the resouce, such as os\_keystone\_domain.
|
||||||
|
* If the module is one that a cloud admin and a cloud consumer could both use,
|
||||||
|
the cloud consumer rules apply.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Interoperability
|
||||||
|
----------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* It should be assumed that the cloud consumer does not know a bazillion
|
||||||
|
details about the deployment choices their cloud provider made, and a best
|
||||||
|
effort should be made to present one sane interface to the ansible user
|
||||||
|
regardless of deployer insanity.
|
||||||
|
* All modules should work appropriately against all existing known public
|
||||||
|
OpenStack clouds.
|
||||||
|
* It should be assumed that a user may have more than one cloud account that
|
||||||
|
they wish to combine as part of a single ansible managed infrastructure.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Libraries
|
||||||
|
---------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* All modules should use openstack\_full\_argument\_spec to pick up the
|
||||||
|
standard input such as auth and ssl support.
|
||||||
|
* All modules should extends\_documentation\_fragment: openstack to go along
|
||||||
|
with openstack\_full\_argument\_spec.
|
||||||
|
* All complex cloud interaction or interoperability code should be housed in
|
||||||
|
the [shade](http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/shade) library.
|
||||||
|
* All OpenStack API interactions should happen via shade and not via
|
||||||
|
OpenStack Client libraries. The OpenStack Client libraries do no have end
|
||||||
|
users as a primary audience, they are for intra-server communication. The
|
||||||
|
python-openstacksdk is the future there, and shade will migrate to it when
|
||||||
|
its ready in a manner that is not noticable to ansible users.
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue