2016-05-14 16:34:38 +02:00
|
|
|
===========================
|
|
|
|
Porting Modules to Python 3
|
|
|
|
===========================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ansible modules are not the usual Python-3 porting exercise. There are two
|
|
|
|
factors that make it harder to port them than most code:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Many modules need to run on Python-2.4 in addition to Python-3.
|
|
|
|
2. A lot of mocking has to go into unittesting a Python-3 module. So it's
|
|
|
|
harder to test that your porting has fixed everything or to make sure that
|
|
|
|
later commits haven't regressed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which version of Python-3.x and which version of Python-2.x are our minimums?
|
|
|
|
=============================================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The short answer is Python-3.4 and Python-2.4 but please read on for more
|
|
|
|
information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Python-3 we are currently using Python-3.4 as a minimum. However, no long
|
|
|
|
term supported Linux distributions currently ship with Python-3. When that
|
|
|
|
occurs, we will probably take that as our minimum Python-3 version rather than
|
|
|
|
Python-3.4. Thus far, Python-3 has been adding small changes that make it
|
|
|
|
more compatible with Python-2 in its newer versions (For instance, Python-3.5
|
|
|
|
added the ability to use percent-formatted byte strings.) so it should be more
|
|
|
|
pleasant to use a newer version of Python-3 if it's available. At some point
|
|
|
|
this will change but we'll just have to cross that bridge when we get to it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Python-2 the default is for modules to run on Python-2.4. This allows
|
|
|
|
users with older distributions that are stuck on Python-2.4 to manage their
|
|
|
|
machines. Modules are allowed to drop support for Python-2.4 when one of
|
|
|
|
their dependent libraries require a higher version of python. This is not an
|
|
|
|
invitation to add unnecessary dependent libraries in order to force your
|
|
|
|
module to be usable only with a newer version of Python. Instead it is an
|
|
|
|
acknowledgment that some libraries (for instance, boto3 and docker-py) will
|
|
|
|
only function with newer Python.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. note:: When will we drop support for Python-2.4?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The only long term supported distro that we know of with Python-2.4 is
|
|
|
|
RHEL5 (and its rebuilds like CentOS5) which is supported until April of
|
|
|
|
2017. We will likely end our support for Python-2.4 in modules in an
|
|
|
|
Ansible release around that time. We know of no long term supported
|
|
|
|
distributions with Python-2.5 so the new minimum Python-2 version will
|
|
|
|
likely be Python-2.6. This will let us take advantage of the
|
|
|
|
forwards-compat features of Python-2.6 so porting and maintainance of
|
|
|
|
Python-2/Python-3 code will be easier after that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supporting only Python-2 or only Python-3
|
|
|
|
=========================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes a module's dependent libraries only run on Python-2 or only run on
|
|
|
|
Python-3. We do not yet have a strategy for these modules but we'll need to
|
|
|
|
come up with one. I see three possibilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. We treat these libraries like any other libraries that may not be installed
|
|
|
|
on the system. When we import them we check if the import was successful.
|
|
|
|
If so, then we continue. If not we return an error about the library being
|
|
|
|
missing. Users will have to find out that the library is unavailable on
|
|
|
|
their version of Python either by searching for the library on their own or
|
|
|
|
reading the requirements section in :command:`ansible-doc`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. The shebang line is the only metadata that Ansible extracts from a module
|
|
|
|
so we may end up using that to specify what we mean. Something like
|
|
|
|
``#!/usr/bin/python`` means the module will run on both Python-2 and
|
|
|
|
Python-3, ``#!/usr/bin/python2`` means the module will only run on
|
|
|
|
Python-2, and ``#!/usr/bin/python3`` means the module will only run on
|
|
|
|
Python-3. Ansible's code will need to be modified to accommodate this.
|
|
|
|
For :command:`python2`, if ``ansible_python2_interpreter`` is not set, it
|
|
|
|
will have to fallback to `` ansible_python_interpreter`` and if that's not
|
|
|
|
set, fallback to ``/usr/bin/python``. For :command:`python3`, Ansible
|
|
|
|
will have to first try ``ansible_python3_interpreter`` and then fallback to
|
|
|
|
``/usr/bin/python3`` as normal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. We add a way for Ansible to retrieve metadata about modules. The metadata
|
|
|
|
will include the version of Python that is required.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Methods 2 and 3 will both require that we modify modules or otherwise add this
|
|
|
|
additional information somewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tips, tricks, and idioms to adopt
|
|
|
|
=================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exceptions
|
|
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In code which already needs Python-2.6+ (For instance, because a library it
|
|
|
|
depends on only runs on Python >= 2.6) it is okay to port directly to the new
|
|
|
|
exception catching syntax::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
a = 2/0
|
|
|
|
except ValueError as e:
|
|
|
|
module.fail_json(msg="Tried to divide by zero!")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For modules which also run on Python-2.4, we have to use an uglier
|
|
|
|
construction to make this work under both Python-2.4 and Python-3::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from ansible.module_utils.pycompat import get_exception
|
|
|
|
[...]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
a = 2/0
|
|
|
|
except ValueError:
|
|
|
|
e = get_exception()
|
|
|
|
module.fail_json(msg="Tried to divide by zero!")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Octal numbers
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Python-2.4, octal literals are specified as ``0755``. In Python-3, that is
|
|
|
|
invalid and octals must be specified as ``0o755``. To bridge this gap,
|
|
|
|
modules should create their octals like this::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Can't use 0755 on Python-3 and can't use 0o755 on Python-2.4
|
|
|
|
EXECUTABLE_PERMS = int('0755', 8)
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-14 16:56:06 +02:00
|
|
|
Bundled six
|
|
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The third-party python-six library exists to help projects create code that
|
|
|
|
runs on both Python-2 and Python-3. Ansible includes version 1.4.1 in
|
|
|
|
module_utils so that other modules can use it without requiring that it is
|
|
|
|
installed on the remote system. To make use of it, import it like this::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from ansible.module_utils import six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. note:: Why version 1.4.1?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
six-1.4.1 is the last version of python-six to support Python-2.4. As
|
|
|
|
long as Ansible modules need to run on Python-2.4 we won't be able to
|
|
|
|
update the bundled copy of six.
|
2016-05-14 16:34:38 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compile Test
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have travis compiling all modules with various versions of Python to check
|
|
|
|
that the modules conform to the syntax at those versions. When you've
|
|
|
|
ported a module so that its syntax works with Python-3, we need to modify
|
|
|
|
.travis.yml so that the module is included in the syntax check. Here's the
|
|
|
|
relevant section of .travis.yml::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
script:
|
|
|
|
[...]
|
|
|
|
- python3.4 -m compileall -fq system/ping.py
|
|
|
|
- python3.5 -m compileall -fq system/ping.py
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the moment this is a whitelist. Just add your newly ported module to that
|
|
|
|
line. Eventually, not compiling on Python-3 will be the exception. When that
|
|
|
|
occurs, we will move to a blacklist for listing which modules do not compile
|
|
|
|
under Python-3.
|